- Todd Moses
- Posts
- Embracing The Fear Of Change
Embracing The Fear Of Change
I have spoken with numerous executives from companies such as Red Hat, Oracle, UPS, Microsoft, and IBM, and they all share a common concern
I have spoken with numerous executives from companies such as Red Hat, Oracle, UPS, Microsoft, and IBM, and they all share a common concern: the fear of making poor decisions.
According to Norwest Venture Partners, 90% of CEOs acknowledge that their primary worry is the fear of failure.
However, exceptional leaders embrace this fear.
Why it matters: Consider Satya Nadella, for instance.
When he became the CEO of Microsoft in 2014, the company had a toxic and siloed culture.
Nadella recognized that the fear of being wrong stifled innovation.
To combat this, he shifted the culture from a "know-it-all" mentality to a "learn-it-all" approach, promoting rapid experimentation and learning from failure.
The AI journey: Similarly, leaders embarking on the pilgrimage to Enterprise AI understand that failure is an integral part of the process.
They view setbacks not as career-ending events but as valuable learning opportunities that encourage growth and innovation.
They implement two-way door decisions that allow for rapid experimentation and foster a culture of a "fail-fast" mentality.
The big picture: When things go wrong, these fear-facing leaders embrace post-mortems and openly discuss their failures to normalize them as necessary components of the invention process.
This practice is reminiscent of Jeff Bezos at Amazon.
Zoom in: To ensure that no failure jeopardizes an initiative, they break large, high-stakes projects into smaller, more achievable goals.
This way, they allow for failures at the micro level to facilitate learning before scaling up to the macro level.
Between the lines: Focusing on the journey of incremental improvement, rather than just the result, allows teams to appreciate small victories and make necessary adjustments throughout the process.
This approach helps alleviate the pressure associated with achieving success or dealing with failure.
Go deeper: An analysis of corporate history reveals a stark choice: leaders can let fear become a paralyzing force that drives them toward mediocrity and eventual irrelevance, as experienced by Kodak, Blockbuster, and Nokia.
Conversely, leaders can choose to harness fear as a source of energy, urgency, and focus.
They can follow in the footsteps of turnaround artists and innovators at IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, and Netflix.
This approach channels the fear of disappointing customers to overcome the fear of internal change, systematically reframing failure as a prerequisite for innovation.
It fosters cultures of psychological safety, where the fear of speaking up is substituted with a responsibility to do so.